Feminist
theory stress that women are underprivileged within society compared to men.
Moreover, men are favoured in society which impacts largely on women’s lives.
As a movement, feminism wishes to have women living on equal terms with men.
However, some radical feminists take this idea further (pearsons, 2010).
In 2010, 17.2 million adult women were poor, compared to 12.6 million adult
men. This suggests huge inequalities within today’s society (Bartelli,I 2012).Feminists
suggest that recent changes in welfare have resulted in the feminisation of
poverty. Increasing numbers of unwanted pregnancies, separations and divorces
have resulted in a high percentage of lone-parent families, usually headed by
women. As well as children, a significant amount of women may have other caring
responsibilities such as elderly family members. These responsibilities may
result in having to take low-paid, part-time employment. Furthermore, in this
area of work women will have less chance of a good pension. Women are also
subjected to stereotyping within the workplace which results in a lack of access
to promotions and lower wages.
Feminism suggests that childcare
costs too much for women, especially those who are lone-parents, to return to
work and are therefore forced to live on benefits. Women who have caring responsibilities
have no specific help from the government. This would allow more to return to
work. Furthermore, women have no specific ‘back to work’ programmes aimed at
those who have children and are seeking employment. This would aid those who
cannot find employment which fits around their responsibilities (Bartelli,I
2012).
Within the study, regarding the welfare reform there are many points. Oxfam’s
main areas of concern included the proposal that a single payment of benefits
would be made to one single claimant within the household. Oxfam found that
this would affect the women and children living within these families severely
as the man is more likely to prioritise his needs over those of his family. The
system assumes that money coming in to the household is shared equally between
couples. Research, however, suggests otherwise and that the use of the income
is dependant on who receives it. Another area of concern that Oxfam focused on
was the move away from universal and non-means tested benefits which provides
essential social protection. Means-tested benefits would again mean more
couples would be jointly assessed and as a result receive a single payment of benefits.
This would be an issue for venerable groups such as migrant women, traveller
women and those who do not speak English as their first language. Furthermore,
the use of stronger conditionality concerns Oxfam as many lone parents, mainly
women, in particular may not be able to meet them. Oxfam believe tat the use of
stronger conditionality should be a policy of last resort. Finally, Oxfam
stressed the impact on women’s motivation and ability to get back to work. Due
to rising costs of childcare, lone parents – again mostly women – find it
difficult to find part-time employment and therefore have to rely on benefits. Child
Tax Credits alone do not cover this cost (Oxfam, 2010).
Low-paid employment and caring responsibilities continue to hold women
back, and cause huge poverty for them in today’s society. Furthermore, inequality
still exists within employment as women who are in employment continue to be
subjected to lower pay than men, even within identical roles.
Feminism, however, has many criticisms. Feminism may be dismissed in today’s
society as some radical feminists groups may be too extreme. Within these
groups, equality is not the issue, but patriarchy. Furthermore, if patriarchy
was to be replaced by matriarchy, this would not resolve the issues of
discrimination.
Oxfam’s study, ‘A Gender Perspective on 21st Century Welfare Reform’,
can also be criticised. The study does not take into account that males may be
the ones caring for children as it focuses on criticising them. Furthermore, it
does not take in to account the nuclear family but focuses solely on lone
parent families headed by women.
Your overview of Feminism applied to social policy was effective but ideally you would have included terminology such as private/public sphere and occupational segregation.
ReplyDeleteA much better evaluation!